To revisit John Burrough’s definition of ritual, the symbolic perception of gardening is to transform the land while allowing the land to transform the self. When understanding the act of gardening as an opportunity for spiritual transformation, it is assumed that there are canonical and self-referential messages to receive from this act. To provide historical support for the necessity of a contemporary gardening ritual, civilization as we know it, was founded upon the creation of settled agriculture, which developed out of the desire to create a more efficient method of attaining the most basic survival need: food. The unignorable fact of nature is that humans depend on the land for food, and as a result, agricultural rituals were designed to celebrate this dependency. Mayans sacrificed their people to appease the gods in the hope that they would be granted with a bountiful harvest, North Americans performed rain dances, and certain ethnic tribes in Thailand ask spirits for approval of selected farming sites. At the heart of all of these practices is the recognition that the resources we take from the Earth are necessary for our survival, but the amount that we are provided is dependent upon a greater natural force, despite the attempts to impose human order onto the production of food. Religions and rituals highlighted and celebrated this dependency and harmony with nature. The absence of agricultural ritual coincides with the evolution of religion. It is a common conception among people that the Western religions are less sympathetic to the natural world than the more Eastern religions.13 This can be understood when observing Aristotle’s viewpoint that humans are the only animals with a sense of morality, denoting a sense of superiority of man over nature14; or, after reading Lynn White Jr.’s criticism of the Christian religion for creating a precedent in support of the right of man to exploit his natural surroundings, precipitating an environmental crisis15. Roy Rappaport suggests that economic systems are becoming the new standard deciding the assignment of value upon the world, making money the new determinant for a fulfilling lifestyle, but his kind of value assignment impinges upon the intrinsic and far more symbolic value of the natural realm.16 These theories express the de-emphasis of the sanctity and importance of the natural realm in our daily lives, substituting a more egalitarian perspective of the relationship between man and nature with a system based in a delusion of superiority and consumerist progression. |